Breaking: Reports Say Danica Patrick Urged NASCAR To Remove Bubba Wallace; Phelps Responds

Breaking: Reports Claim Danica Patrick Asked NASCAR To End Bubba Wallace’s Career — What We Know
Multiple outlets and industry insiders are reporting that Danica Patrick, the retired racer and high-profile motorsports personality, allegedly urged NASCAR leadership to take the extreme step of removing Bubba Wallace from 23XI Racing and potentially from the sport entirely. These are unverified reports and should be treated as claims pending independent confirmation. NASCAR’s leadership, including CEO Steve Phelps, has acknowledged the situation in a brief statement that raised questions and prompted significant public reaction.
This article compiles the context, reaction, and potential implications of the controversy while emphasizing that key details remain disputed. Our coverage focuses on verified facts, documented statements, and documented patterns of reaction from fans, sponsors, and teams.
Timeline and reported allegations
According to sources who spoke to media outlets, tensions reportedly built behind the scenes over recent weeks, culminating in an alleged request by Patrick to NASCAR executives. The request has been described in some unconfirmed reports as a call for decisive disciplinary action against Wallace that could include removal from his team.
Shortly after those accounts circulated, NASCAR issued a public statement addressing the reports and reiterating the league’s commitment to performance standards, safety, and organizational processes. The statement did not confirm any personnel actions regarding Wallace, but its tone and timing triggered widespread speculation and media scrutiny.
Immediate reactions: fans, drivers, and sponsors
- Fans: Social channels filled quickly with polarized reactions. Hashtags and campaigns surfaced in support of Wallace and in calls for transparency from NASCAR.
- Drivers and industry figures: Several drivers and commentators urged caution, highlighting the need for due process rather than premature judgment based on unverified reports.
- Sponsors and partners: Some sponsors reportedly monitored the situation closely; in similar past controversies, brands evaluate reputational risk and may pause or reassess visibility deals until facts are clear.
‘Any decision that affects a driver’s career should follow transparent, documented procedures, and be based on verifiable facts,’ said one industry analyst who asked not to be named.
Why this is significant for NASCAR
Bubba Wallace is one of the sport’s most recognizable drivers and a prominent voice for diversity and inclusion within motorsports. If true, the reported request by a high-profile figure like Danica Patrick to end a competitor’s career would be unprecedented in the modern era and raises questions about governance, influence, and fairness.
The alleged incident highlights several broader issues:
- Power dynamics between former stars, current athletes, and executives
- The role of public statements in shaping careers and public perception
- How leagues manage internal disputes while protecting due process and reputations
What NASCAR has said — and what remains unknown
NASCAR’s publicly released comments reiterated core values around safety and competitive integrity but stopped short of confirming any disciplinary outcome for Wallace. Because the details remain contested, observers cautioned against assuming that reported demands translate directly into action without corroboration from the league or the team involved.
Key unknowns include the exact content of any private exchanges, the identity and reliability of every source, whether 23XI Racing or its ownership has been formally engaged, and what procedural steps NASCAR would take before removing a driver from competition.
Potential next steps and implications
Possible developments to watch include:
- Formal statements from 23XI Racing, team owners, or Bubba Wallace himself.
- A fuller response from NASCAR clarifying the status of any inquiry or personnel decisions.
- Actions by sponsors or partners if new facts emerge that materially affect reputation or contractual obligations.
Legal and contractual considerations could be significant. Driver contracts, team agreements, and league bylaws typically outline specific procedures for disciplinary action. Any permanent removal would likely involve formal review and potential legal scrutiny.
How to interpret developing news responsibly
When high-profile controversies surface, it is important to differentiate between allegation and established fact. Readers should look for primary documents—official statements from NASCAR, 23XI Racing, or the individuals involved—and be cautious of secondary reports that cite anonymous sources without corroboration.
We will continue to monitor verified updates and post clarifications as authoritative information becomes available. In the meantime, the episode serves as a reminder of how quickly reputations and careers can be affected by public allegations, and why transparent processes matter in professional sports.
If you have firsthand information or official documentation related to this story, please contact our newsroom so we can assess and verify those materials.




